Exercise 2.16. Statement is true because, for any , let . Then, as , we have , as required.
Statement is false as the following counterexample shows. Let and . Then , but there is no integer such that . (Many other counterexamples exist, of course.)
Exercise 2.17. Suppose that is a factor of . Then we can take such that . Theorem 4.2.17 implies that there are such that and , and hence we have
so that is a factor of .
Bonus exercise 2.22. Suppose that , and let . Then is a factor of and of , and therefore is also a factor of by Lemma 4.2.13. Hence is a positive common factor of and , so as , we must have , that is, . Similarly we see that . By Exercise 2.12, this implies that .
Alternative proof, using material from Section 4.6. Suppose contrapositively that and are not coprime. Then, by the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, they have a common prime factor; that is, we can find a prime number which divides both and . The latter condition implies that divides or by Proposition 4.6.2. If divides , it also divides by Lemma 4.2.13, whereas if divides , it also divides . Hence in both cases is a common factor of and , which are therefore not coprime.