[M2.68L] [M2.68] 68 Note The great det. 5th in the Pal. Pruli beside the principal angle shaft, secondly for its distorted tracery rudely finestrata have had cusps like the rest, now cut given at p 39 1 door book. The central trefoil should be away. I am particularly puzzled in this palace by the symmetrical but the relation of the cutting out of the introduction of the heads in the capitals; the capped ones cusp is true as compared with that of the semi lateral have indeed an early look - but the others are blundering trefoil. The fact is the semicircle is described with & clumsy - & like a copy - from what? if not from Ducal palace the outer roll of tracery; Then the inner mouldings make The whole has been however so patched that it the space to be foliated too small and in order to give would need as much work as the Ducal palace itself to disentangle it. the effect of a semi trefoil, the foils are made even less Compare house No 94 p 42 Door book. than semicircles, and the spandril space is thrown nearly upright: Yet the figure if complete would not be a 4 foil, it is altogether nondescript and deceives the eye so cleverly that I did not see it till I drew the tracery This is the most remarkable instance I have yet obtained of Italian adjustment. The tracery bar is given real size with root of cusp, p 78 1 Gothic book, fig 1 the arch with cusp profile fig 2 the surrounding square moulding with the tracery "junction bery anomalous?) p 78 fig 3. the capital of the great angle shaft, (shaft of grey granite), for greater strength I suppose) fig 4. the pil head fig 5. The angle shaft has a plain raised leaf base; the pils have a dog tooth on the base, and a curious emergent small shaft half way up, which has carried something, now broken away; they are bold cch and have florid capitals withmenschild heads vilely cut.
[Version 0.05: May 2008]