68 68 angle shaft, secondly fr. its di[o]sturbed tracery rudely given at p 39 1 door book. The central trefoil should be symmetrical but the relation of the cutting out of the Note The great det. 5th in the Pal. Pruli b[s]eside the prin- cusp is true as compared with that of the semi lateral cipal finestrata have had cusps lime the rest, now cut trefoil. The fact is the semicircle is described with away. I am particularly puzzled in this palace by the the outer roll of tracery; Then the inner mouldings make introduction of the heads in the capitals; the cupped ones the space to be foliated too small and in order to give have indeed an early look - but the others are blundering i[n] the effect of a semi trefoil, the foils made[are] even less palace. The whole has been however so patched that it than semicircles, and the spandril space is thrown nearly would need as much work as the Ducal palace itself to dis- upright: Yet the figure if complete would not be a 4 entangle it. foil, it is altogether nondescript and deceives the eye so Compare house No 94 p 42 Door book. cleverly that I did not see it till I drew the tracery This is the most remarkable instance I have yet obtained of Italian adjustment. The tracery bar is given real size with root of cusp, p 76 1 Gothic book, fig 1 the arch with cusp profile fig 2 the surrounding square moulding with the tracery "junction bery anomalous?) p 78 fig 3. the capital of the great angle shaft, shaft of greay granite, far greater strength I suppose) fig 4. the pil head fig 5. The angle shaft has a plain raised leaf base; the pils have a dog tooth on the base, and a curious emergent small shaft half way up, which has carried something, now broken away; they are bold cch and have florid capitals with child heads vilely cut.
[Version 0.05: May 2008]