[M2.13L] [M2.13] 13 DUCAL PALACE ST MARKS p 183 Pareri makes me think the "ambulum" may have been a walk outside on the top of the present arcade? Again, Vid Selvatico’s note at p 108 about the red columns, He assumes somewhat too boldly that they could not be the same as now. (St Mark’s. En passant, I must see what Cicognara says of Andrea Pisano’s sculptures there. Quoted p 110 Selvatico) Ducal palace. The passage at 109 is the clearest of Selvatico’s he will have the whole thing knocked down and rebuilt and still we come to the face of the refare la fazade. But observe, Selvatico at p 520 gives the Capitals of lower story to the year 1463 and the porta della Carta to 1443 This, I think is absurd but I cannot compare the sculptures carefully. bringing it connected also with the work of the Madonna del At p 136 Selvatico we have three documents fixing the Orto, which compare 1399. door safe enough to 1443, It is ridiculous supposing the palace of same time. q. These statues were those on the renaissance pyramid But then what were the "Figure" for which the Bons opposite Giant’s stair built 1462; vid below p 72. were paid in 1443 quoted by Sel. p 134. A. were they not the statues in the Gothic work of the facade, otherwise unnoticed by Selvatico, except at p 389.
[Version 0.05: May 2008]