[M2.12L] [M2.12] 12 DUCAL PALACE Now, Bettio p 9 says that Calendario finished the larger Council to the 7th column and that the junction is plainly seen. But Bettio is documentarily wrong in his cane ogmen sa if Calendario was absent in 1350. Selvatico. depends on the words of the Cronaca Zancarola refare le fazada, (p 125) I should like to see the words of the decree itself but looking at it to-day, I think it evident that the whole upper part has been of brick; and the refare le fazade refers to the marble only. I must examine therefore this marble facing, with respect to its joints, upon the arcade, to its junction with central balcony etc. Selvatico’s idea is evidently that the interior of the palace was built at the time stated by Sansovino vid sentence at p 127, and faced afterwards; the outer column being adapted to the inner cross wall. But what does he mean by faced There is but one wall and that stands on the pillars if the wall was there, the pillars must have been there - or else, the wall was inside on the inner arcade, of which he says nothing. What his idea is, hardly appears. But the words of the decree Note. The words of the decree, p 183 pareri fiat id quod famae honor, et utilitas terrae.
[Version 0.05: May 2008]