13 13 DICAL PALACE ST MARKS p 183 Pueri makes me think the "embalma" may have been a walk outside on the top of the present arcade? Again, Vid Selvatico’s note at p 108 about the red columns, the measures somewhat too boldly that they could not be the same as now. (St Mark’s. En passant, I must see what Cicoguana says of Andrea Pisani sculptures there. Quoted p 110 Selvatico) Ducal palace. The passage at 109 is the clearest of Selvatico’s he will have the whole thing knocked down and rebuilt and still we come to the rface of the refare la fazade. But observe, Selvatico at p 520 gives the Capitals of lower story to the year 1463 and the portico della Corte to 1443 This, I think is absurd but I cannot compare the bringing it vonnected also with the work of the Madon[j]na del sculptors carefully. Orto, which compare 1399. At p 136 Selvatico we have three documents fixing the door safe enough to 1443, It is ridiculous supposing the q. These statues were those on the renaissance pyramid palace of sme time. opposite Gi[x]ant’s stair built 1462; vid below p 72. But then what were the "Figure" for which the Bones were paid in 1443 quoted by Sel. p 134. A. were they not the statues in the Gothic work of the fa- cade, otherwise unnoticed by Selvatico, except at p 389.
[Version 0.05: May 2008]