E.1 Workshop exercises from week 1
Exercise 1.1., ,
and .
Exercise 1.2. As
there are statement variables involved, the truth table must have
rows and the following columns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise 1.3.
-
(i)
because
|
|
|
for each ;
-
(ii)
;
-
(iii)
because for
all .
Exercise 1.4.
-
(i)
.
-
(ii)
.
-
(iii)
We claim that the statement is false. In other words,
we must prove that its negation found in (ii) is true. To this end,
let be given. Choosing , we have
, as desired.
Exercise 1.5. There is
no model solution to this exercise (or any of the subsequent exercises
concerning the Self-explanation strategy) because correct answers can
vary substantially. The main point is that your answer should support
your understanding of the proof. You may find it useful to get
together in a small group to discuss and compare your answers. In
particular, seeing the answers of others may inspire you to explore
alternative approaches to the proof.
Exercise 1.6.
We construct the truth tables.
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T |
T |
T |
T |
T |
|
|
|
T |
T |
T |
F |
T |
|
|
|
T |
T |
F |
T |
T |
|
|
|
F |
F |
F |
F |
F |
|
|
|
T |
F |
F |
F |
F |
|
|
|
T |
F |
F |
F |
F |
|
|
|
T |
F |
F |
F |
F |
|
|
|
F |
F |
F |
F |
F |
As the fifth and eighth columns are the same, we conclude
that the statements ‘‘’’ and ‘‘ or ’’ are
logically equivalent.
Exercise 1.7.
-
(a)
-
(i)
.
-
(ii)
.
Note: repeated quantifiers of the same type and over the
same set are often combined into a single one, so that this
statement can also be written
|
|
|
A third way of writing it would be .
-
(iii)
.
-
(b)
-
(i)
.
-
(ii)
.
Alternatives: ;
Alternatives:
.
-
(iii)
.
-
(c)
Statement (i) is
false because the function given by
is increasing and , whereas .
Statement (ii) is true;
this is the fundamental way of expressing rational numbers.
Statement (iii) is false
because the discriminant of the quadratic polynomial
is negative: .
Exercise 1.8. We construct the
truth tables; as there are statement variables involved, they have
rows.
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the third and fifth columns are the
same, we conclude that the statements ‘‘’’ and
‘‘ or ’’ are logically equivalent.
Exercise 1.9. As
there are variables involved, the parity table must have
rows and the following columns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise 1.10. , ,
and .
Note: .
Exercise 1.11. As
there are statement variables involved, the truth table must have
rows and the following columns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise 1.12. As there are statement
variables involved, the truth tables have rows and the
following columns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since the fifth and eighth columns of this table are the
same, the compound statements ‘‘’’ and
‘‘’’ are logically
equivalent.
Exercise 1.13.
-
(i)
We construct the truth tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the fourth and seventh columns are the same, we conclude that the
statements ‘‘’’ and ‘‘ or ’’ are
logically equivalent.
-
(ii)
Consider the two basic statements
-
‘‘I closed the windows’’;
-
Then ‘‘’’ represents
‘‘I did not close the windows and the door’’,
while ‘‘ or ’’ represents
‘‘I did not close the windows or I did not close the
door’’.
These two sentences have the same meaning.
Many other examples are of course possible.
Exercise 1.14.
-
(i)
.
Alternatively, we can combine the first two quantifiers and write
this statement as .
The negation is , or alternatively just
.
-
(ii)
.
Alternatively, this could be written .
Negation: , or alternatively
.
-
(iii)
.
Negation: .
-
(iv)
.
Negation: .
Exercise 1.15.
-
(i)
No triangle is isosceles. (Or: there does not exist an isosceles
triangle.)
-
(ii)
There exist triangles that are not similar. (Or: there exist
triangles and such that is not similar to .)
-
(iii)