DENNETT DEFENDS THE LANGUAGE OF THOUGHT HYPOTHESIS

"As we ascend the scale of complexity from sim-ple thermostat, through sophisticated robot, to human being, we discover that our eftorts to design systems with the requisite behavior increasingly run foul of the problem of combinatorial explosion. Increasing some parameter by, say, 10 percent - 10 percent more inputs, or more degrees of freedom in the behavior to be controlled, or more words to be recognized, or whatever - tends to increase the internal complexity of the system being designed by orders of magnitude. Things get out of hand very fast and, for instance, can lead to computer programs that will swamp the largest, fastest machines. :Now somehow the brain has solved the problem of combinatorial explosion. It is a gigantic network of billions of cells, but still finite, compact, reliable, and swift, and capable of learning new behaviors, vocabularies, theories, almost without limit. Some elegant, generative, indefinitely extendable principles of representaion must be responsible. We have only one model of such a representation system: a human language. So the argument for a language of thought comes down to this, what else could it be?"

Daniel Dennett, "True Believers: The Intentional Strategy" reprinted in Lycan, Mind and Cognition, 2nd Edition, Oxford, 1999, Blackwell, p.85,6.


back

222 home