Which best expresses Locke's view of the tree falling unheard in the forest?

A. The noise, just like the tree itself, doesn't exist in any meaningful way when absolutely nothing is hearing or perceiving it.

B. It makes the same sound as one hand clapping.

   
C. When the tree falls it causes vibrations in the air, but in the absence of a perceiver they don't get converted into an experience of sound. D. Even if there are no human beings around there is likely to be some living thing in the vicinity - eg a badger.   Ask a friend
       

C. is the right answer.

Locke doesn't think the existence of a thing is at all threatened by it's not being perceived. Berkeley thought it was, and had two answers to the question of what happened when a thing was not being perceived by us. A. is a sort of crude version of Berkeley.

D. misses the point.

B. I don't really understand what this is saying, though I'm fairly sure Locke wasn't saying it.

Back