56 56 Doges Palace. Bettio’s account setting aside his assump- tions that it is Salundario’s work, is all right as far as page 10. but then comes his curious blunder in his desire to correct Crecognans. The former is indeed wrong in saying dopo le prima sei secate; right in mark- ing the beginning of the sala del Socraturio and Bettio has missed the real place of junction in his desire to correct Cicoguana - himself concluding that the larger column is the mark of it. A But, if as I once fancied, there was an arcade all round Calendono, work, this larger column ought indeed to have been at the angle This is a great puzzle. Torrosella. This word explained by Bettio p 23 Note by the bye, Sausovino attribution of the redand white facade to the Foscari p 3o9 and consider the top of the campanile worked in same way. B. Then - see what Bettio quotes at p 27 of Sausovnio which must be spurious, for I don’t think that bas relief of Venice in[s] Calendario’s work at all Next½ Bettio supposes that from the two great arches, there was a grand staircase down, and at p 27, 2u he gets very interesting, quoting mention in Swiss Chronicle of the old palace which was knocked down in 1423, or 4. Now there
[Version 0.05: May 2008]