[M2.56L] [M2.56] 56 [drawing] Doges Palace. Bettio’s account setting aside his assumptions that it is Calendario’s work, is all right as far Central niche as page 10. but then comes his curious blunder in his should have desire to correct Cicognara. The former is indeed steps but not wrong in saying dopo le prima sei secate; right in marking [?] [?] [?] [?] the beginning of the sala del Scrutinio and Bettio has missed the real place of junction in his desire to correct Cicognara - himself concluding that the larger column is the mark of it. A But, if as I once fancied, there was an arcade all round Calendario’s work, this larger column ought indeed to have been at the angle This is a great puzzle. Torresella. This word explained by Bettio p 23 Note by the bye, Sansovino attribution of the red and white facade to the Foscari p 3o9 and consider the top of the campanile worked in same way. B. Then - see what Bettio quotes at p 27 of Sansovino which must be spurious, for I don’t think that bas relief of Venice is Calendario’s work at all Next Bettio supposes that from the two great arches, there was a grand staircase down, and at p 27, 28 he gets very interesting, quoting mention in Sivos Chronicle of the old palace which was knocked down in 1423, or 4. Now there
[Version 0.05: May 2008]