234 10 with that of its superstructure, applied entirely to the area of its own base, may not crush the materials or dis- turb the joints of the foundation: The wider and deeper their stone on which the pillar is based, the better; but it evidently must not be mdde wide without being deep. For in such case, as, suppose at a opposite, there would be a strong probability of the foundation stone’s bre[a] breaking in the centre, as at 6; in which case the build- ing would instantly become unstable; while if no founda- tion stone had been employed at all, the pillar might have sunk gradually into the ground without in any wise losing its stability; The more solid the block therefore the better; and the larger the better, up to the point at which it loses its subordinati[o]on to the pier, and be- comes a needless weight of stone requiring a foundation for itself. Supposing the foundation of the whole edifice itself solid and well knit, the most natural and simple form of base would be a block projecting (certainly not more than one half the diameter of the column on each side of it) to about the degree of the jut of the capital, and of the not less depth than two thirds of its width, as a2 Evidently however, when the pier is large, such an arrangement would greatly i[u]nterfere with the acces sibility and convenience
[Version 0.05: May 2008]