[M2.10backL] [M2.10back] 10 [diagrams] with that of its superstructure, applied entirely to the area of its own base, may not crush {the materials} ordisplacedisturb the joints of the foundation: The wider and deeper their stone on which the pillar is based, the better; but it evidently must not be made wide without being deep. For in such case, as, suppose at a opposite, there would be a strong probability of the foundation stone’s breaking in the centre, as at b: in which case the building would instantly become unstable; while if no foundation stone had been employed at all, the pillar might have sunk gradually into the ground without in any wise losing its stability; The more solid the block therefore the better; and the larger the better, up to the point at which it loses its subordination to the pier, & becomes a needless weight of stone requiring a foundation for itself. Supposing the foundation of the whole edifice itself solid and well knit, the most natural and simple form of base would be a block projecting (certainly not more than one half the diameter of the column on each side of it) to about the degree of the jut of the capital, and of the not less depth than two thirds of its width, as a2 Evidently however, when the pier is large, such an arrangement would greatly interfere with the accessibilityof& convenience
[Version 0.05: May 2008]