pile of books
skip main nav
 Ling 131: Language & Style
 

 Topic 7 (session A) - The grammar of complex sentences > Text effects > Task C > our answer

skip topic navigation
Session Overview
SPOCA Review
Grammar made easy - the basic principles
Linking, listing and nesting clauses
More nesting
Text effects
Linking, listing & nesting checksheet
Complex SPOCA self test
Topic 7 'tool' summary
 
Useful Links
Readings

Text effects of linking, listing and nesting

Task C - Our analysis

Other things being equal, putting material in a main clause makes it more prominent than if it is put in a nested clause. So in this respect the prominence of the two propositions is reversed in the above two sentences. That said, other factors affect prominence too. In particular, there is a tendency for important information to be placed towards the ends of clauses, sentences and larger structures like paragraphs. This is usually called the principle of end-weighting. This means that 'Lennie reached for it' is end-weighted in both of the sentences.

The first sentence ('Curley's fist was swinging, when Lennie reached for it.') is a sentence that actually occurs in Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men. You will remember that we met the character Lennie in Task A. In the novel, Lennie, a man who is like a child but also immensely strong, commits a mounting series of transgressions which are not really his fault. Here, the character called Curley picks a fight with Lennie to demonstrate to the other men on the ranch what a good boxer he is. Lennie is afraid, and when Curley attacks him he grabs Curley's fist and hangs on, accidentally crushing it with his enormous strength, and ending Curley's boxing career.

We can now see more easily why the sentence is structured as it is. 'Lennie reached for it' is end-weighted because it is the important new piece of information - the situation in the fight is about to change. So far Curley has hit Lennie and Lennie has not responded. Now he does. But at the same time Lennie's action is coded as less prominent than Curley's through its placement in the nested clause. This structuring thus helps to reduce the salience of Lennie's action, and his culpability for what happens.

There are other important factors which reduce Lennie's culpability. We have already pointed out that Curley is the aggressor, not Lennie. And it is also important to notice the sequencing of the clauses in this respect. Other things being equal, we expect the sequence in which actions are presented to us in texts to correspond with the sequence of actions in the world of the fiction. So the sequencing here underlines what readers already know in more general terms - namely that, even though he is the one who is injured, Curley attacks Lennie, not the other way round, and so is himself at fault for what happens to him.

Towards the end of the novel, Lennie accidentally kills Curley's wife, and Curley, who already bears a significant grudge, leads a lynch mob who will execute him if they find him. To prevent Lennie dying in terror at the hands of the lynch mob, his friend George, who knows he is not culpable, sits behind Lennie, who is looking out across the Salinas valley, and tells him about the dream farm that they are going to own. Then, when he is certain Lennie is happy, George shoots his friend in the back of the head. Lennie is certain to be killed, and George ensures he is killed in the most humane way possible in the circumstances.

 


to the top
Next: Task D - more nesting next

Home ¦ Outline ¦ Contents ¦ Glossary