More about shared schematic knowledge
Task B – Our answer
The
man in the uniform is unlikely to be a university teacher because university
teachers don’t normally wear institutional uniforms (even though
the ubiquitous informal trousers plus shirt/blouse and or jumper constitute
the informal equivalent of a uniform).
The
man in the mortar board and gown is stereotypical, and would have been
common in earlier generations, but is now rather rare. This example helps
us to see a distinction between the stereotype and the schema. Stereotypes
are often outdated schemas or exaggerations of schemas. Even so, the stereotype
is bound to share some features with the schematic prototype. Even though
there are many more women university teachers than there used to be, males
still predominate. And although most academics do not need a stick to
walk with, age is a factor: even the youngest university tedachers will
be in their late twenties because of the time it takes to train to PhD
level (a normal prerequisite for academia these days). Glasses are also
pretty common, being largely a function of age and the need to do lots
of reading in the job.
The
baby is clearly much too young to have gained the requisite knowledge
and skills, even if it is a child prodigy. And the (lack of) clothing
and dummy are pretty unlikely too!
The
woman with blackboard rubber and chalk fits the university teacher category
(though it is worth noting that blackboard and chalk are becoming rare
in the early 21st century, as is the skirt). In terms of appearance, the
female figure is ambiguous between the categories of university teacher
and schoolteacher.
The
figure of the man with the tie, like the woman, is somewhat ambiguous.
Some male university teachers do wear ties, so this aspect of his dress
fits. But given the rather elementary sum on the blackboard, you may well
conclude that he is a primary school teacher rather than a university
teacher – unless he is using the simple example for some other teaching
purpose.
|