Top Girls revisited - with politeness in mind
Task E – Our answer
Win’s mitigation strategy here is similar to that she used in
turn 11. The NP ‘no long term understandings’, although it
is more specific than ‘any trouble, any reason’ of turn 11
(and so is slightly more threatening), does not suggest who might have
misunderstood who (though our schematic assumptions suggest that the best
odds must be on Win having misunderstood a superior). The phrase is also
rather vague. Similar things can be said about ‘an insupportable
atmosphere’. In addition, ‘come to a sudden end’ also
fails to indicate who or what made the understanding ‘come to an
end’. Louise is clearly sacrificing the Gricean maxim of manner
in order to mitigate her positive and negative FTA.
In general terms it is important to notice how the Gricean maxims and
Politeness Theory constraints interact with one another here. It looks
as if they will interact with one another in many other situations too,
not just this conversation between Win and Louise.
|