Which is the correct account of Berkeley's argument

A. A windmill looks exactly the same to someone near at hand as it does to someone a long way away - in perception we make the appropriate adjustment in the light of how near we are to the object B. A windmill looks differently to two different observers just as a bowl of water may feel warm to one and cold to another    
C. Windmills and bowls of water have absolutely nothing to do with each other D. In giving his argument from the bowl of luke warm water Locke takes a misleading case. Most of the time two people in the same room would be used to the same temperature and the water would feel just the same to both.  
       

D would miss the point of Locke's argument and Berkeley doesn't make this mistake.

He doesn't use C. either.

Berkeley's argument relies on the reverse of A. - he thinks the windmill may look difefrent from different viewpoints - as stated in B., which is the best answer.

 

Back