PHILOSOPHY HOME PAGE

100 Introduction to Philosophy 

100 HOME PAGEH

LIST OF COURSESME PAGE

PHIL 100/200 Week 3

NOTE SHEET

The attempt to reconcile freewill with determinism

The compatibilist line of argument:

What we mean by 'free' is unconstrained.

  • First example: You can't hang on any longer
  • Second example: the kleptomaniac magistrate
  • (Digression: Separating clear points out and articulating them is a large part of philosophising. And a difficult one.)
  • Third example: action under duress

How might our actions be 'constrained'?

  • Action under duress
  • Habitual obedience
  • Psychological condition
Examination of compatibilist argument

Argument for 'free' not meaning 'uncaused'.

  • 'Free' is only meaningful if it is used to make a distinction.
  • If 'free' meant 'uncaused', it would apply to nothing (if determinism is right).
  • Therefore, 'free' cannot mean 'uncaused'.
Compatibilism riposted

What is important is whether a different decision could have been taken.

Compatibilist response: 'could' means would have if circumstances had been different. A determinist can use 'could' in this sense.

The anti-compatibilist response: the question is whether we can choose categorically, not hypothetically.

 

VP

100 HOME PAGE | LIST OF COURSES |  PHILOSOPHY HOME PAGE

University Approved Page prepared by VP