Agenda
The Problem of Evil
An argument against the existence
of God?
Assumptions:
1. The Creator is
Omnibenevolence
Omnipotence
Omniscience
2. The world is imperfect
Some alleged proofs of the existence
of God
ontological argument
teleological argument
there couldn't possibly be a Universe unless Something beyond
the Universe brought it into being
the Universe wouldn't stay in existence unless something
beyond it was sustaining it in existence
we wouldn't have the idea of God unless there really were
a God
from miracles
'The problem of evil' as an argument
that God could not have created a world in which bad things happen
Premise 1: God is perfectly good
Gods are not always thought of
as good.
A perfectly good, all powerful,
omniscient God could not have produced an imperfect world.
If the world is imperfect, the Christian God does
not exist.
But the world is imperfect.
Therefore God, as conceived by Christianity, does
not exist.
Single is the race, single
Of men and of gods;
From a single mother we both draw breath.
But a difference of power in everything
Keeps us apart
Pindar
" A people gets the gods
which it deserves. The wayward and inscutable demons who pester
man [sic] are born of nameless terrors and inhibiting ignorance;
the grinning, gloating ogres of the Aztecs mirrored a race brutalised
by incessant war and fearful of unknown privations; before the
Romans were moved by Greek influences to abandon their stubborn
rusticity, their gods were prosaic, functional, and sanitory;
the passion of the Jews for legalistic discipline in all departments
of life and their exclusive nationalism found an appropriate champion
in Jehovah."
C.M.Bowra, The Greek Experience,
New York and Washington, 1969, Praeger, p.42.
Premise 2: God is omnipotent
Is there any way out?
Premise 3: God knows everything
Flaws in the argument ?
Attempts to resolve 'the problem of evil'
- The Free-will argument
- We are just seeing a bit of the picture.
- The Universe is better with some bad things in it than
it could be if there were no bad things.
Leibniz
The Free-will argument
Does omniscience inlude knowledge
of the future?
(And why free-will?)
Against the free will argument:
some bad things that happen don't appear to be the fault of human
beings
Can you think of an account which
would blame eg all disease on the misuse of human free-will?
Against the free will argument
We are just seeing a bit of the
picture
1. apparently bad things will
be revealed as good
or
2. Bad things will seem justified
Is invoking a wider context a
solution?
Attempts to resolve the 'problem
of evil'
3. The Universe is better with
some bad things in it than it could be if there were no bad things.
The argument is about a concept, not about God
A contradiction to say that a being who is
wholly good
all-powerful
all-knowing
created an imperfect world.