100
HOME PAGEH
LIST
OF COURSESME
PAGE |
PHIL 100 Exam: Rubrics and Questions
Rubrics
Lancaster University 1999 Examinations
Part 1
Philosophy
100 Introduction to Philosophy
3 Hours
Answer three questions, 2 from section A, 1 from section B.
Note:
Section A: 10 questions Covers all the course except the Summer
Term (Morality)
Section B: 2 questions Covers the Summer Term
Sample questions:
- Do you think you can combine a scientific approach to the
world with a belief in human freedom?
- In discovering the cause of something are we doing more than
discovering a pattern among events?
- Explain and evaluate one alternative to determinism.
- Identify a film (or play, or novel) which explores at a challenging
level the theme that human behaviour can never be fully simulated
by computer. Explain why it is challenging.
- How would a utilitarian decide whether a particular action
(e.g. telling a lie) is right or wrong? What, in your opinion,
are the main strengths and weaknesses of their approach?
- Critically discuss the claim that there is no objective truth
in ethics, because what is right and wrong is a matter of opinion,
and this varies from culture to culture.
- -
- EITHER: Evaluate the attempt to deduce the existence of God
using the ontological argument;
- OR: Assess the claim that intelligent design is the best
hypothesis by which to explain natural order;
- OR: Can the non-existence of God be deduced from the existence
of evil and suffering?
- Discuss the claim that religion shows us the limits of reason.
- Outline the grounds on which a philosopher might be sceptical
about the existence of the material world, OR the existence of
other minds, OR the rationality of induction. What do you consider
to be the most effective form of reply to the sceptic?
- Which is the more rational strategy, to believe nothing for
which you do not have good evidence, or to retain all your existing
beliefs, however you came by them, only rejecting a belief when
you find evidence against it?
- What does Gilbert Ryle mean by a 'category mistake'? How
is Cartesian dualism based on a category mistake? do you agree
with Ryle? Why or why not?
- Critically discuss D.M. Armstrong's claim that mental states
are physical states of the brain.
- Can computers think? (Discuss with reference to John Searle's
Chinese room argument.)
- Does eliminative materialism offer a satisfactory solution
to the mind-body problem?
|