Case Study No. 2 - Creative Group Processes, University of Ulster
Name
of module/ course: |
THS303C1 Community Drama 1: Creative Group Processes |
Programme |
BA
TheatreStudies BA
Humanities Combined |
Institution: |
University
of Ulster |
Level: |
2 |
Typical
number of students: |
16 |
Area |
Key
Aspects |
ü
if addressed |
Developing
effective group behaviour |
Group
formation |
ü |
Training |
ü |
|
Monitoring |
ü |
|
Assessing
behaviours & processes within groups |
Assessing |
|
preparation |
|
|
operation |
ü |
|
reflection |
ü |
|
Assessing
|
|
|
whole
groups |
ü |
|
individuals
within groups |
ü |
|
Assessing
group products |
Assessing |
|
whole
groups |
ü |
|
individuals
within groups |
ü |
Special
Features:
This
is an elective module, the first of four in community theatre practice. Its
primary focus is on the practices of playback and action theatre. Both forms
require spontaneity and ensemble improvisation. Playback Theatre actively
involves members of the audience during the process of performance. Stories are
told and the actors re-enact them immediately. Action Theater focuses upon the
development of awareness. Performance content is an intuitive expression of the
performer’s response to her experience of the moment. Integration of the two
forms is part of the student’s learning experience. Rehearsal and prepartory
exercises for both have much in common. Thus key aspects and principles of
community drama are exemplified in this module: group work, personal
development, spontaneity, priority of process over product, and inclusivity.
Description
of Key Aspects:
Students
are led by the tutor through a range of practical workshop activities and
experiences. They are then allocated randomly into groups to undertake a
Playback theatre performance. They are given a group mark for this.
Students
are also assessed individually for their peer evaluation of the work of another
group’s performance and their self evaluation of their own group’s
performance according to the principles of the Playback form.
The
final assessment element is an individual essay, in which the student may draw
on their experience, observation and reading to form the evidential basis of
their discussion.
Analysis
The
key element here is that the process of working together is made transparent by
the improvisational response from each student in the particular role in which
they are performing. At the same time, the whole group must work together in
response to one another. So there are both individual and collective incentive
structures.
The
provision for individual written assessments allows the possibility of
differentiating between students, militating against any ‘free-rider’ effect
and testing individual student learning. The
capacity to reflect upon and evaluate their own work and the work of others
through self- and peer- assessment ensures that students are able to match
theoretical principles to their own practice.
Evaluation
The
module shifts students away from practices in which performance and assessment
are separated out from their own preparation, thinking and reflection. Students
practice the various methods and roles for collaborating as part of learning
about the forms. The transparency of the
processes of group collaboration in the moment of performance allows the process
to be effectively assessed as it takes place. The assessment of the group piece
does require a sensitivity on the part of the lecturers who are assessing to the
various roles which students may take up.
The specificity of these theatrical forms may appear to limit the possible transfer to other contexts. However, improvisation is a common practice across the performing arts disciplines, particularly in dance and jazz.