262 212 ST MARKS NICHES. how curiously manly and simple as opposed to the filigree niches with rib vaulting of even earlier times - Bayeau for instance in the north. Fig 1 p 62 1 is the masonry on above head at angle; going on each side to edge of capital fig 1 p 62 profile in front. fig 2 p 63 the dentil at the top showing joints and the curius intaglio diamond, now to me at angle of dentil and the neat touch- ing of the apex of arch under centre of dentil block All should be much neater than I have drawn it. Fig 3 p 63 1 shows relation of the leaden flower to size of spandril finally at p 61 is the profile of cusp - The arch dentil is only about 1/2 to 2/3 the width of angle wonderfully pure and beautiful for this style, cut clear and cornice dentil Correct this in fig 1 p 62 it is and at p 61 1 continued on p 61 is the section of arch right at p 62 1. The manage[m]ment of angle dentil at p mouldings real size note that the dentil is small and flat 64 1 a profile b c sections the blocks joining each as compared with angle dentil (which from its mode of other. turning is necessarly bold): the cavette singularly sha[w]llow[a], the roll as singulaely bold. The line b at p 61 is section at base and apex of arch. b2 at penetration of cusp, c the cusp itself ought to be about 2 inches wide, i.e. d e in fig 1. This niche would be perfectly beautiful but for its leaden flowers a great fault common to all the rest. Its shafts have no bases: capitals noted at p 50, somewhat roughyl cut when seen close bu[y]t very perfect in effect; It has a very noble, slightly colossal armed figure, Michael? Which has chain mail under a jointed cuirass - or rather jointed body armour. This figure appears
[Version 0.05: May 2008]