86 82 b c is at the true maximum width of enclosed foliating space in cusp of small arch: the cusp of the trefoil in the round is about twice as deep (a is same line in all these sections) C. Through great roll and cusp of central or lateral 4 foil only lateral have no outer fillet, tak[x]e the dotted line and in central; between the cusps x y is slurred into x2 D. through cusp of great circular 4 foils; the dotted line being section between cusps. F. through upper triangl[e] and G. on the abacus of pendant of small sub arches. The expedient employed in the altered section C. by missing the cavette and smaller roll, and thi[x]s enormously deepening the cusp, to get greater space for foliation is to be carefully noted: Again in G. note that - all being to same scale,m,n is double of m2 n2 in B. Why this is, will be seen in the very careful profile of the entire cusp of sub arch at F. H. which shows also the same law observed in the circle above: and the neat adjustment of that circle exactly to the apex of pointed arch; the junction is clearer at K. It is evident that in this tracery there is no thought of a continuous series of 4 foils cut off. It is complete in itself like the traceries of the North. But by far the most curious Frari tracery is that on No 150 - it is one of the pairs of arches which cross the windows of the small
[Version 0.05: May 2008]