[M2.19L] [M2.19] 19 ROMANESQUE [drawings] shows the light admitted through the circle above the central window and gives the tracery in the other three (more in the central) all of same pattern as opp. It is difficult to say whether the upper part be or be not meant for a wooden framework inside - corresponding to tracery outside, a and b were sketched from the print they should be filled up like c. which seems to show a double window; the transverse shading lines should be darker Romanesque of Venice. My first step must be to fix something like a date for the groups of Round and Byzantine arches. Now: in the first ages of Xtianity; the form described by Lord Lindsay Letter 1 p 7 We have almost the type of a Byzantine church: Curious - if the noble cupola had indeed its origin in the Gave: if that which Lord Lindsay thinks the type of heaven, was indeed only the hollowing of the earth. But Lord L. (Note of Alexandria - Its Pagan catacombs the same. For Works on Catacombs, vid Note p 8) dismisses this idea at p 9; yet allows enough evidence of it at p 15 + Note - Mosaics used in the basilicas and Opus Graecanicum, p 17. Observe the distinction between Byzantine and Roman
[Version 0.05: May 2008]