[M2.178L] [M2.178] 178 I have noted above p 171 the repose of its sculptured subject. Its sculptured treatment however is not in repose at all. At Lyons the wild subjects are in low relief Here we have gentle subject in high relief. There is something like the effort of a mind naturally less energetic to set forth feeble thoughts by strong language There is a depth of cutting and hollowing everywhere which is now curiously opposed to the Italian and Lyons manners: Proutism I have a hundred times noted the Proutism of Lombard work Proutism to my idea consists in broad masses of shade amid light, the latter decorated with rich linear ornament This is the entire spirit of Italian design. The Northern work at Bourges and I think characteristically elsewhere depends on crowded and compared points of shade and so wearies the eye: The Byzantine or Lombard never lose the mass - however beautifully they undercut - or however deep their points of shade; and their surface chasing, as well as that of the Romans, as on arch at l’Orange is lovely; It is most curious to see the entire absence of all surface chasing from the dresses of the figures on the western porches here, and the breadth & simplicity of the folds: In the Romanesque porches however - more especially the southern one, there is a mixture of the two manners, rich folds, and surface chasing in abundance, with quantities of undercutting, and, which is most notable, complete niches, fastened to
[Version 0.05: May 2008]