[M2.155L] [M2.155] 155 may be authoritatively set forth by ministers of the Church of England: it is not therefore to them that this letter is addressed A much larger class are I trust those who allowing a certain efficacy to Baptism, they hardly know what, perhaps more as an act of obedience than as a Sacrament yet would certainly deny that Christ was more ready to receive their children then than at any other time or that there was any correspondence between the presenting them at the font, and the bringing them "to the presence of Christ and to his arms." I entreat those persons at this juncture carefully to consider and determine 1st. What efficacy they suppose to belong to the act at all. 2nd. In what manner this determined efficacy is attached to it. 1st. Be clear in your conception of its efficacy; and in order A to do this, do not confuse the question - what Baptism is, and conveys with the question, whether infants should be baptised or not - above all do not argue that Because baptism is bestowed on infants, there it can only mean this or that. You are not distinctly told in the Bible that Baptism should be given to Infants; but you are told very distinctly what Baptism is. Receive therefore from the Bible as you would from another book what you are told distinctly before what you are told indistinctly. Treat the question of Infant Baptism separately altogether
[Version 0.05: May 2008]