[M.217L] [M.217] Ramo Rimpetto Mocenigo 217 Measures for p. 29 Bit book. m.(soffit of brickwork) to correspondent point on opposite Doors. Close to this house, at the end of a small closed alley, the side of arch) 3 " 8 Ramo Rimpetto Mocenigo is this exquisite door, sketched n (or n in fig 3) to similar opposite point 3 " 5 generally at p 27 bit book. It is built into the wall, and n-n2 breadth of archivolt 0 " 6 filled up but without injury or loss except only of the m-y pure brickwork exclusive of dentil &mouldings 0 " 3 jamb part of its surrounding square architrave. This is in c Cavide note opposite * 3 " 1 red Verona and about 8 inches wide as far {as} it is exposed: p C [symbol] 7 " 5 precisely in principle like the Sta Margheretta one: all that q C 3 " 7 is visible of the section is at fig 1 p 29 l being built up r C [symbol] 10 " 3 at the point b. On p 29 is a careful drawing of the C to ground 8 " 0 angle of this architrave and the head of the door, and a b circa 0 " 8 in section of fig 1. the line a2 is the level of the recessed x y vertical 2 "11 wall above a on p 29, while the stone panel of shield is z z 0 " 2 advanced to the front level a. Fig 2 is section r r2 on p 29 and fig 3 its very singular lower moulding [symbol] The points r and p are the r and p of p 28 a {most} careful drawing of larger. Now: y in p 29 being inner edge of dentil and the top of the door:not to be confused with the rs of p 29. x the angle on outer edge of flat brickwork, observe that z z is of course in stone, it is cut off (by the new buildings I think) abruptly x should be exactly above y and not the inner edge of above x. it is seen better on p 28 where its section is at fig 1 the upright bricks (as looks natural at first) The coat of arms square inside arch is about 1 " 9 or 1 " 10 wide * Note also on measure cC that C is of course the usual centre including the dentils. of arch, on the red Verona lintel, but the point of the shield ought not to touch this - nor even to touch its dentil nor the latter the lintel but should be as on p 30 fig 4. The measure of C was unnecessary, but is neatly confirmatory of nn2
[Version 0.05: May 2008]