444 APPENDIX, 14

order. There are some arts and sciences which we underrate, because no one has risen to show us with what majesty they may be invested; and others which we overrate, because we are blinded to their general meanness by the magnificence which some one man has thrown around them: thus, philology, evidently the most contemptible of all the sciences, has been raised to unjust dignity by Johnson.* And the subject is farther complicated by the question of usefulness; for many of the arts and sciences require considerable intellectual power for their pursuit, and yet become contemptible by the slightness of what they accomplish: metaphysics, for instance, exercising intelligence of a high order, yet useless to the mass of mankind, and, to its own masters, dangerous. Yet, as it has become so by the want of the true intelligence which its inquiries need, and by substitution of vain subtleties in its stead, it may in future vindicate for itself a higher rank than a man of common sense usually concedes to it.

Nevertheless, the mere attempt at arrangement must be useful, even where it does nothing more than develop difficulties. Perhaps the greatest fault of men of learning is their so often supposing all other branches of science dependent upon or inferior to their own best beloved branch; and the greatest deficiency of men comparatively unlearned, their want of perception of the connection of the branches with each other. He who holds the tree only by the extremities, can perceive nothing but the separation of its sprays. It must always be desirable to prove to those the equality of rank, to these the closeness of sequence, of what they had falsely supposed subordinate or separate. And, after such candid admission of the co-equal dignity of the truly noble arts and sciences, we may be enabled more justly to estimate the inferiority of those which indeed seem intended for the occupation of inferior powers and narrower capacities. In Appendix 14, following, some suggestions will be found as to the principles on which classification might be based; but the arrangement of all the arts is certainly not a work which could with discretion be attempted in the Appendix to an essay on a branch of one of them.

14. P. 67.-DIVISIONS OF HUMANITY¹

The reader will probably understand this part of the subject better if he will take the trouble briefly to consider the actions of the mind and body of man in the sciences and arts, which give these latter the relations of rank usually attributed to them.

* Not, however, by Johnson’s testimony: Vide “Adventurer,” No. 39. “Such operations as required neither celerity nor strength,-the low drudgery of collating copies, comparing authorities, digesting dictionaries, or accumulating compilations.”

¹ [The first rough draft of this appendix occurs at the end of Ruskin’s Venetian diary, 1849-1850. It begins thus:-

“ClASSIFICATION OF ARTS

“I have always felt that in every subject of science, it was very vain to dispute respecting modes of classification; but that many classifications would occur to the minds of those who were familiar with the subject, of which sometimes one, sometimes another, would be adopted according to the object in view; but of which all would present some inconvenience if rigidly adhered to.”]

[Version 0.04: March 2008]