|
skip
main nav Ling 131: Language & Style |
|
Topic 6 (session A) - Style and Style variation > Language Variation: Register > Task A |
Session Overview |
Style Variation in USA |
Language Variation: Dialect |
Language Variation: Register |
Style Variation in a poem |
Reregistration |
Style: What is it? |
Authorial and text style |
Style Variation Checksheet |
Topic 6 'tool' summary |
Useful Links |
Readings |
Language Variation: RegisterTask A: MediumWe are going to look at three pieces of language which we have invented. We have done this to ensure that they have roughly the same content but differ according to medium. (a) Identify which medium you think is involved
in each case and You can compare your conclusions with ours by clicking on the button after each text.
Our answer:This is clearly a letter or memo, and so is an example of writing. The graphological layout, and formulaic opening and closing, is typical of a letter. The sentences are well-constructed and some of them (sentences 3 and 4) are quite complex grammatically. This is typical of writing. Writers have plenty of time to compose their sentences exactly as they want them to be. This often leads to longer and more complex sentences than in speech. The lexis is also relatively formal and polite, which is also typical of writing.
Our answer:This is a representation of some speech to roughly the same effect as the letter, in the form of a transcription of the conversation. Apart from the question marks, which we've put in to help you, the dashes representing small pauses and the new line each time a new speaker starts, there is no punctuation here. This is because punctuation is a feature of writing, not speech. Besides exhibiting the turn-taking typical of speech, this text contains examples of the non-fluency that is normal in rapid unscripted conversation (so-called 'normal non-fluency'). Because we have little time to edit what we say in rapid conversation, we typically produce 'performance disfluencies' as we speak:
The lexis is also much more informal than the memo, as is some of the
grammar (cf. the elliptical 'got a minute dan' at the beginning.)
Our answer:This example is clearly an email message, with an automatically generated header. Its header could possible be a memo header, but when typing memo-headers, writers do not normally use '0' before the numbers 1-9. The subject line also contains a couple of orthographical oddities, which could well just be errors. The first word does not have a capital, and there is no question mark to accompany the interrogative grammatical structure. This kind of disfluency is repeated in the body of the email itself. Typing errors have not been corrected. The informal email between friends or colleagues is often said to be a register which bears a mixture of features associated with speech on the one hand and writing on the other. Essentially, it is very rapid typing, with writing disfluencies (cf. the normal non-fluency of rapid speech) which are often only corrected if they would lead to a communication problem. The use of the abbreviated word forms '@' 'cttee' and 'M', and the elliptical last sentence also indicate informality and the need for speed. But the overall graphological design of the message itself resembles the letter form, and the salutation and signature are informal variants of that form. Reading:Crystal, D and D. Davy (1969) Investigating English Style, London: Longman.
|