pile of books
skip main nav
 Ling 131: Language & Style
 

 Topic 6 (session A) - Style and Style variation > Language Variation: Dialect > Task C > our answer

skip topic navigation
Session Overview
Style Variation in USA
Language Variation: Dialect
Language Variation: Register
Style Variation in a poem
Reregistration
Style: What is it?
Authorial and text style
Style Variation Checksheet
Topic 6 'tool' summary
 
Useful Links
Readings

Language Variation: Dialect

Task C - our answer to question 2

What feature mark Joseph's dialect?

Graphology and Pronunciation

The spelling of 'gooid' for 'good' may be a graphological indication of accent, or perhaps an unusual pronunciation indicating his extreme surprise at what Isabella has just said. 'Ortherings' is an indication of a Yorkshire dialect pronunciation of 'orderings' (which is also an unusual lexical form of 'orders'). Other straightforward graphological indicators of dialect are: 'maisters' for 'masters', 'mun' for 'must', 'hev' for 'have', 'o'er' for 'over', 'niver' for 'never', 'mud' for 'might', 'lave' for 'leave' and 'owld' for 'old'. It is interesting how close some of these forms ('lave' and 'owld' are to Molloy's Northern Irish indicators we saw in Task B. The use of 'heead' for 'head' suggests a lengthening and dipthongisation of the vowel which supports the possibility that 'gooid' is dialectal. The most stereotypical Yorkshire dialect accent indicators are the two forms for 'the', 't'' and 'th'', depending on whether the following phoneme is a consonant or a vowel. These are well-known markers of Yorkshire dialect.

Grammar

'Getten' for 'have got'.

Lexis

'Ortherings' for 'orders', 'flitting' for 'leaving', 'nigh' for 'near' (though this use is common in many regional dialects

 


to the top
Back to task C next

Home ¦ Outline ¦ Contents ¦ Glossary