pile of books
skip main nav
 Ling 131: Language & Style
 

Topic 3 (session A) - Patterns, Deviations, Style and Meaning > Parallelism: non-literary examples > Task C > Our answer

skip topic navigation
Session Overview
Overview of foregrounding, deviation and parallelism
Foregrounding
Deviation: non - literary examples
Deviation: literary examples
Parallelism: non-literary examples
Parallelism: literary examples
 
Useful Links
Readings
 

Parallelism: non-literary examples

Our answer for task C - 'Opposite meaning'

"Naughty but Nice"

In this slogan there is parallelism at more than one linguistic level. There is grammatical parallelism because the coordination involves two one-word adjectives. There is phonological parallelism because of the word-initial alliteration between 'naughty' and 'nice'. And there is graphological parallelism because of the initial capitalisation of the initial 'n' for each word.

Notice how this parallelism and the 'opposite' coordinating conjunction 'but' lead us to assume that the two adjectives are antonyms (opposites). But if you look them up in a dictionary you will see that they are not normally antonyms in English. It is the parallelism that is helping to rearrange our lexicons for us as we read this slogan.

What we have noticed so far about this ad helps us to show how the cream producers in the UK softened the idea that cream is bad for you (fat, cholesterol, associations with heart failure etc). 'Naughty' is a good lexical choice with respect to this aim because although its connotations are negative, they are nothing like so negative as 'nasty' or 'bad for you'. Note also that the sequencing of the adjectives also plays a role. 'Nice but naughty' would be nothing like so effective. Persuasively it is important to counter the unfortunate associations first, and then end on the positive.

You will have noticed that on the non-literary deviation page we looked again at some advertising slogans we had discussed in Topic One. A number of things we looked at there could be better described via the concept of deviation (and so foregrounding too). Notice that the examples we looked at in the first session will also involve foregrounding effects through parallelism. If you have time, you might like to look back through those pages now that you have begun to learn about parallelism, to see how important parallelism is in the examples we were using to discuss the effects of different linguistic choices.

If you want to read more about the language of advertising, the following books are helpful.

A. Goddard (1998) The Language of Advertising (Routledge)
G. N. Leech (1966) English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain (Longman)
G. Myers (1994) Words in Ads (Arnold)

 


to the top
Next: Task D - Parallelism and Political Speeches next

Home ¦ Outline ¦ Contents ¦ Glossary