pile of books
skip main nav
 Ling 131: Language & Style
 

Topic 2 (session A) - Being creative with words and phrases > Manipulating word classes > Nouny styles > Our answer

skip topic navigation
Session Overview
(Semi) Automatic poetry
Introducing word classes
More on word classes
Manipulating word classes
Changing word class - affixation
Changing word class - functional conversion
New words for old
Word class problems
Word class checklist
 
Useful Links
Readings
Grammar Website
 

Manipulating word classes

Nouny styles: Our Analysis of Ulysses

First of all, it is important to notice that the context surrounding sentence 2 is absurd. To have a quarrel at a public execution about the date of birth of a saint is itself very odd, and given that the saint lived a long time ago, his exact date of birth is unlikely to be known. However, if the two sides are arguing over the date (the 8th or 9th of March) we will assume that the contending parties each have some evidence in favour of each of the dates. But then the solution proposed which ends the argument is an entirely different date in March (the 17th) which is the arithmetical sum of the first two, and the acceptance of this entirely different date appears to have nothing to do with evidence, or logic, at all.

About 35% of the words in the passage are nouns (compared with the Ellegard norm of 27%). The nouns in sentence 2 are comprised almost entirely of a long list of items said to have been used in the argument. These items suggest not a debate but an enormous and very vicious physical brawl This brawl, in turn, seems to disappear magically when Constable MacFadden suggests the 17th as St Patrick's date of birth.

16 of the 29 words in sentence 2 are nouns and 13 of these 16 are involved in the long list of fighting implements. They are also all plural nouns. These two facts help us to infer that the fight involved a very large number of people indeed. Assuming only two implements for each plural and one implement per person, the absolute minimum involved in the fight would appear to be 26 people!

The fact that the list of nouns is so long leads us to look at the nouns in the list a bit more carefully. The list is very variable in its composition. Some items (e.g. knuckledusters) are things which we can imagine being involved in a street brawl. Others (e.g. cannonballs, blunderbusses) seem more appropriate to warfare. Umbrellas are not prototypically weapons, but we can imagine how they might be used as such if nothing better was to hand. Stinkpots, however, normally occur in the context of school pranks. Some of the items (scimitars, boomerangs) appear to be associated with particular national/racial delegations who might be in attendance at the execution. All of this adds to the bizarre sense of disorder and confusion which James Joyce clearly sets out to create.

 


to the top
Next: Verby Styles next

Home ¦ Outline ¦ Contents ¦ Glossary