pile of books
skip main nav
 Ling 131: Language & Style
 

 Topic 13 - Shared knowledge and absurdist drama (Session B) > Assumptions in Applicant > Task F > answer skip topic navigation

Topic Contents
Absurdist drama
Zoo Story
Getting to know Applicant
Assumptions in Applicant
Turn-taking in Applicant
Topic 13 "tool" summary
 
Useful Links
Applicant Passage
Readings
 

Assumptions in Applicant

Task F – Our answer

To ask whether someone is a virgin or not is something which prototypically applies to females, although it has been extended to males in the 20th century in particular. But to use the Latin expression ‘virgo intacta’ seems to tie the question in turn 47 pretty firmly to females (it relates to whether or not the vaginal hymen is intact), and so for Miss Piffs to ask this question of a young man is very strange indeed. It seems to presuppose that he is female or has female genitalia. That said, the question does not appear to be absurd to Mr. Lamb, but merely embarrassing. So, as with ‘falling coat’ there is a big presuppositional clash between (a) the world of the two characters together and (b) the world of the audience.

When Miss Piffs asks ‘have you always been virgo intacta?’ in turn 53, she is being presuppositionally absurd in a different way. It is part of the definition of being a virgin that you must always have been a virgin. You can’t switch virginity on and off like a light. So the question is presuppositionally absurd (even though Mr. Lamb answers it affirmatively!). This absurd presuppositional clash between the world of the characters and the world of the audience is then made even more peculiar through the stylistically inappropriate phrasing of ‘from the word go’, which is a metaphor derived from athletics that is usually used in informal contexts.

 


goto top of page
Next: Turn-taking in Applicant next

Home ¦ Outline ¦ Contents ¦ Glossary