pile of books
skip main nav
 Ling 131: Language & Style
 

 Topic 12 - Meaning between the lines (Session A) > Top Girls > Task D skip topic navigation

Session Overview
Inference and the Discourse Architecture of Drama
Grice's Cooperative Principle
Practising Gricean Analysis
Top Girls
Conversational implicature and The Dumb Waiter
Gricean Self-Test
 
Useful Links
Top Girls Passage
Readings
 

Top Girls

Task D - Our answer

22. LOUISE: No, no dependants. My mother died.

For the first time Louise answers a question straightforwardly and cooperatively. The fact that her conversational behaviour has changed in this turn is an internal deviation (and so foregrounded) and can be interpreted at the author-audience/reader level as indicating that either this topic is not threatening to her or she is feeling a bit more at ease in general terms.


23. WIN: So why are you making a change?

Win now re-asks the question she has been asking from turn 1 onwards, but in a much more explicit manner.


24. LOUISE: Other people make changes.

Louise's response clearly breaks the maxim of relation. There is still an issue about whether the break is a flout or a violation at the character-character level. At the upper discoursal level Caryl Churchill is implicating to her audience that Louise has reverted to the socially uncooperative conversational behaviour we have seen before, and which clearly cannot serve her best interests.


25. WIN: But why are you, now, after spending most of your life in one place?

In the last turn of the extract Win re-asks her previous question in more exact terms, echoing what we saw in the discussion of Louise's age in turns 5-8. This flout of the quantity maxim implicates her determination to get top the bottom of whatever the problem is.

Immediately after this turn, where Win is extra-explicit and extra-precise, the conversational dam breaks and in a series of long turns Louise tells Win that she has worked long, hard and effectively in her job but has seen a series of rather untalented young men promoted over her. It is this extreme dissatisfaction with her work situation that has led a very loyal employee to want to move.

Note how much less effective this information would have been if Louise had answered Win's initial questions straightforwardly at the beginning of the conversation. Coming after the defensive and uneasy behaviour we have seen, Louise's explanation is bound to feel more foregrounded and more emotional, investing the scene with considerably more drama than if the answers to Win's questions had been given without demur. Louise'sconversational behaviour has indicated how upset and angry she is about how she has been mistreated in her job, in ways that appear to be sexist, as well as unfair.

 


goto top of page
Next: Conversational implicature and The Dumb Waiter next

Home ¦ Outline ¦ Contents ¦ Glossary