data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cdae/1cdae3997753e88cb5982c5b4255679b21ccc82b" alt="Health Variations Newsletter" |
Close
window to return
|
Issue 6, July 2000,
pp.4.
Reports
from the Programme conference:
The influence of
family patterns of ill-health and early life experiences on behaviour
in mid-life
Kate Hunt, Graham
Watt and Carol Emslie
The reduction in coronary
heart disease (CHD) and in inequalities in CHD is a public health priority.
Some of this could be achieved through changes in behavioural risk factors
for CHD. However, decisions about such behaviours are complex and take
account of many factors, including knowledge about the lives and health
experiences of family members. In this study we conducted in-depth interviews
with 61 people in their forties to examine whether ideas about 'family
histories' of heart disease influenced decisions about health-related
behaviours.
The study confirmed the importance of 'heredity' in lay notions of the
causes of heart problems. However, while some people saw themselves as
definitely 'having' a family history of heart problems, others (in particular
men in manual socio-economic groups, i.e. those at highest risk of CHD)
were much more ambivalent. People often made a distinction between inherited
risk within their family as a whole and for themselves personally. Thus,
believing that heart disease 'ran' in the family was not automatically
translated into a belief that they themselves were at higher risk, or
that they should be particularly careful about health-related behaviours.
The research highlighted some specific ways in which coronary advice is
discounted or undermined. Lack of certainty in predicting coronary events
at an individual level and the perception of heart disease as a 'good
way to go' were two such barriers. Another barrier which people identified
was the notion of 'legacies' from their past. Family history, past exposure
to tobacco smoke and past diet were commonly mentioned. Thus, some people
felt that behavioural change was not sufficient to counteract past experience
and exposures.
|