Stage One
Outline Programme Approval
Indicative timeline - December 2024 and March 2025
Outline Programme Approval was completed through the submission of Stage 1 forms in December 2024 (for UG programmes) and March 2025 (for PGT programmes) when faculty portfolio proposals were considered on behalf of University Executive Board by the Deputy Vice-Chancellor and University Academic Dean (UAD).
Stage Two
Departmental Peer Review
Indictive timeline - April to August 2025
Departmental Peer Review of completed programme approval paperwork is intended to sense-check documentation to ensure completeness and alignment with the Education Framework prior to submission for approval. Expectations of peer review can be found here and guidance is provided here. There is a requirement for the Head of Department to confirm peer review has been completed appropriately before endorsement by the Faculty Associate Dean for Education. Once these steps have been completed, programme approval paperwork can be submitted to Academic Quality, Standards and Conduct (AQSC), using templates found below for consideration by a Cross-Faculty Approval Panel (CFAP).
Stage Three
Cross-Faculty Approval Panel
Indicative timeline - May to September 2025
Cross-Faculty Approval Panels will be convened from a university-approved pool of Chairs and panel members. Each CFAP will consider a group of related programmes previously agreed by departments in association with their Quality Assurance and Enhancement Manager (QAEM). CFAPs may include both academic and professional service staff and operate under approved terms of reference as defined within the Policy. An annotated agenda for CFAPs can be found here.
Stage Four
Institutional Approval Panel
Indicative timeline - April to October 2025
The Institutional Approval Panel, chaired by the University Academic Dean, and including among its members Faculty Associate Deans for Education, will oversee the process of approval. It can grant institutional approval to programmes and modules that have been approved at faculty level by a Cross-Faculty Approval Panel. It will also consider any issues referred from Cross-Faculty Approval Panels and will report to Academic Standards and Quality Committee.