Isobel Forsyth
My dissertation research investigates how international students’ mental health has been impacted by COVID-19. Prior to the pandemic, there has been considerable effort to prioritise student mental health at UK universities (Thorley, 2017), yet international students remain an overlooked minority (Chen et al, 2020). My research explores to what extent the provision of mental health counselling disadvantages speakers of languages other than English, focusing on the barriers that affect their accessibility of services offered by Lancaster University.
Using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2021) I discuss preliminary findings of an online survey of 42 international undergraduate students at Lancaster University and insights from 4 follow-up interviews. My analysis indicates that mental health provisions have been inadequate for international students throughout the global pandemic. In this context, linguistic and cultural barriers deterred students from seeking mental health counselling offered by the University. Preliminary findings suggest that successful counselling and utilisation of resources are dependent upon the proficiency of students’ English. These findings tie in with current research that spotlights how the global pandemic has intensified existing inequalities in the access to healthcare that disproportionally affect speakers of minority languages. (Piller et al., 2020)
Isobel Forsyth
2. Methodology
3. Results
This section will outline the socio-demographic results from the survey as well as the results for the engagement and awareness of the University's mental health provisions.
4. Discussion
I will give a brief summary fo the results of the survey referring to quantatitive data from the survey and interview excerpts.
I will outline the main findings of this study and explain their significance.
The services included:
- The University's Counselling Service
- SilverCloud
- Lets Talk
- 30 Minute Clinic
- The University's College Advisory Teams
- The Wednesday Thing
- University Workshops
- This survey included two types of questions.
- Open-response questions enables participants to provide more detailed responses.
- Likert-scales: 5 point scale 1 strongly agree, 5 meaning strongly disagree
- Using both qualitative and quantative methods produced more insightful data.
- 4 semi-structured interviews with international students who studied at Lancaster during the pandemic.
- Semi-structured interviews more effective, more conversational than focused groups.
- I analysed participant's responses to the survey to tailor specific questions to the interviewee.
- Analysed interview excerpts and survey responses following Braun & Clarke's (2021) thematic analysis.
- Stages: Familiarisation, coding, finding patterns of meaning, finding themes, finalising.
- All L2 speakers of English
- All undergraduate international students
- 42 respondents, 32 female, 10 male
- Predominantly, aged 19-23
Awareness and Engagement in the University's Services
Theme 1: COVID-19 and the Impact on Student Mental Health
- The codes in table (2a) reveal that changes in the perception of mental health were different for each individual.
- The vast majority of respondents stated that their mental health did decline and COVID-19 did have a long impact on their mental health.
- The codes in table (3a) and interview excerpts highlight the inability to see significant others due to coronavirus measures led to a decline in well-being.
Theme 2: The Prominence of English in Mental Health Provisions for International Students
- 36% respondents did agree or strongly disagree that their limited proficiency of English limited their accessibility.
- 17% were neutral, their proficiency in their L2 was sufficient enough to access services.
- 47% of respondents who either disagreed or strongly disagreed that it was not only language barriers that affected their accessibility.
- The codes in table (6a) identify the participant's preference to use their L1 in psychotherapy.
- Language and cultural barriers may deter students from accessing the university's services.
- Thus, accessibilty and the success of their counselling is dependent on students' proficiency of their L2.
Theme 3: The Pandemic and the Marginalisation of International Students
- Figure (14a) 19% of respondents were neutral.
- 21% of respondents either disagreed or strongly disagreed their background as an international student makes it more challenging to access mental health provisions.
- However, 60% either agreed or strongly agreed with Q36.
- International students are marginalised due to other accessibility issues including geographical restrictions.
- Other issues including financial stability exacerbated the decline of mental health.
- Participants identified a hierachy with domestic students prioritised over international students.
Theme 4: The University’s Responsibility and Position in the Pandemic
- 46% of respondents either strongly agreed or agreed that the university had considered their mental health.
- Although, 30% were neutral, and 24% either strongly disagreed or disagreed.
- Therefore, 54% of students felt that university did not do enough to support them.
- Some students who used the services did have positive perceptions of the services.
- Some students did not think the services were 'high quality.'
- This led to some students using external services as they deemed them as more 'professional' and 'higher quality.'
- The university did not adequately publicise the services avaliable or the option to have counselling in their L1, leading to the services being underutilised.
- Lack of social interaction
- Academic stresses
- Stigma regarding mental health
- Financial issues
- Accessibility issues in mental health provisions
- The measures set in place by Lancaster University were underutlised due to a number of accessibility issues.
- Although, there was a number of measures in place for international students to access, the University failed to adequately publicize them leaving students feeling disadvantaged and marginalised by their institution during the pandemic.
- This study is significant as it reveals personal perspectives on how the mental health of international students has been impacted by the pandemic.
- It establishes what barriers this overlooked minority face when accessing mental health provisions, especially the impact of language barriers.
- This study establishes how English mediated communication in psychotherapy can marginalise minority speakers.
- A further study could be extended to other international students at UK universities to see how the barriers to mental health provisions affected different students.
- Thorley, C. (2017). Not By Degrees: Not by degrees: Improving student mental health in the UK’s universities. IPPR: London, UK.
- Alharbi, E. S., & Smith, A. P. (2018). Review of the literature on stress and wellbeing of international students in English-speaking countries. International Education Studies, 11(6), 22-44.
- Rolland, L., Dewaele, J. M., & Costa, B. (2017). Multilingualism and psychotherapy: exploring multilingual clients' experiences of language practices in psychotherapy. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(1), 69-85.
- Braun, & Clarke, Victoria. (2021). Thematic analysis : a practical guide to understanding and doing (1. ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Tarkar, P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on education system. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9s), 3812-3814