We now collect a few test procedures that can be used to find out whether a series converges or diverges. However, not all series can be treated with one of these tests, and sometimes it is necessary to find out “manually” as we shall see.
Let and be two series. Suppose there is such that , for all . If is convergent then is convergent as well. In other words, if is divergent then is divergent as well.
Comment: This is useful if you can compare “term-by-term” with a sequence for which you already know whether it converges or diverges.
To be done in MATH210. ∎
The series is convergent, because for all and is convergent.
The series is
convergent, because
(note that ) and the series
is convergent by Proposition 2.2.3.
The series is convergent if and divergent if . If then for all , and is convergent. If then for all , and is divergent. It can actually be shown to be convergent for all .
Let and be two series. Suppose there is such that and for all , and that converges to a non-zero limit as . Then is convergent if and only if is convergent.
Comment: This is useful if you can compare “asymptotically” with a sequence for which you already know whether it converges or diverges.
To be done in MATH210. ∎
Is convergent or divergent?
To answer this question, we can use the simple comparison test as well as the limit comparison test.
By the limit comparison test: if and then as ; since is divergent, so is .
By the simple comparison test: since whenever , and is divergent, so is .
Let us instead look at the series
We know from Example 2.3.2(2) that converges, but for all , so we cannot apply the simple comparison test. Instead as , so we can apply the limit comparison test to show that converges.
Let be a series. Suppose there is such that for all , and suppose there is such that as . Then
if then converges;
if then diverges;
if then may converge or diverge.
Comment: The top candidate among the tests – this is useful in many cases, especially if you cannot compare with another sequence but instead you know something about the “asymptotic behaviour” of the ratios .
To be done in MATH210. ∎
Let . Then
so is convergent by the ratio test.
When a series contains both positive and negative terms, the sequence of partial sums is no longer increasing, and there are various ways in which it might fail to converge. For example, if then the partial sums alternate between and .
If is convergent then so is . Furthermore, .
Comment: Good if you have a series with some positive and some negative terms and you know that without the minus signs it would already converge.
Exercise X. ∎
The series is called absolutely convergent if the series converges.
Given a sequence .
If , does convergence of imply absolute convergence? Does absolute convergence imply convergence? Explain briefly. If you have more time, then prove Proposition 2.3.8.
Suppose now that all are negative numbers. What can you say about (1) in this case? Explain briefly.
If is decreasing and tends to then is convergent.
Comment: Applicable if you have alternatingly positive and negative consecutive terms in your series.
Let . Then the sequence is increasing, since
Also, is bounded above by , since
As we remember from MATH113, a bounded and increasing sequence converges, so has a limit .
Since as and the sum of convergent sequences is convergent, we see that the sequence converges to , too. Hence the whole sequence (with both even and odd ) converges, with limit . ∎
prove first convergence for even terms using monotonicity, then use
Consider the series defined by
Does the series converge or diverge?
Consider the series
Since as , we cannot apply Leibniz’ criterion. In fact, let denote the -th partial sum for the series. Suppose were the limit of and consider . Then since
we see that, for all , either or . This contradicts being the limit of , so the sequence of partial sums does not converge and hence the series is divergent.
Consider the following series
Since all terms are positive, we do not need Leibniz’ theorem. On the other hand, we do not have any suitable series to compare to. The parts seems to diverge, while the changes the situation. A good test in general is the ratio test, which yields
Since the limit , the ratio test implies that the series converges.
Some series of your choice: