Given a sequence in , we can write
for every fixed : we take the sum of the first terms of the sequence by induction. But can we also study expressions of the form
where the implication is that the addition goes on forever? What does this mean? Summing up all terms of the sequence? Nobody (and no computer) can actually perform infinitely many additions. In the same way as does not exist as a term of the sequence , we cannot sum up infinitely many terms. Consider an example:
Here the “running total” is successively , , , , …, and these numbers tend to according to MATH113. What mathematical concept does this remind you of?
Sums have always finitely many summands, so we need to properly define what we mean by these “infinite sums” in general. How to do this? And how to compute it afterwards? Given , , , …in , let
be the so-called -th partial sum. If the sequence tends to a limit as , we could say
We formalise this in the following definition:
Given a sequence in , the corresponding series is the formal expression .
The series is said to be convergent if the sequence of partial sums converges, and in this case we call this limit the sum of the series and write
so we can identify the series with a real number;
otherwise, the series is divergent and remains a formal expression with no associated real number.
Comment: Be careful: like a sequence, a series may converge or diverge, but so far we have no connection between the convergence/divergence of a sequence and the convergence/divergence of the corresponding series!
We can relate these terms as follows:
original sequence
sequence of partial sums
series
You can move forward and backward between them.
Given a sequence like , the corresponding sequence of partial sums is determined by
The last equality is proved by induction, MATH101. We know from MATH113 that as , so the corresponding series converges and .
Given a series like , the corresponding original sequence is , and the sequence of partial sums .
Given a sequence of partial sums , the corresponding original sequence must have been , where and , for all . This is so because , so . Since the sequence of partial sums
converges to , the corresponding series converges and . Notice that we have not said anything about the series and in fact it will be shown in Proposition 2.2.4 that the latter one diverges.
Some more examples:
Now some elementary facts that follow at once from the corresponding statements about limits:
Suppose we have two convergent series and . Then:
for every constant ;
;
if for all then .
Exercise X. ∎
If a series is convergent/divergent then so is any other series formed from it by altering only finitely many summands.
Exercise A2.1. ∎
Let be a sequence. Then
if as then the series is divergent.
Comment: This is useful in order to tell with certainty if a series diverges – but it does not always detect divergence.
We prove the contrapositive: if converges then as . In fact, notice that, if the series converges then by definition the sequence of partial sums converges, say to some number , so
proving our claim. ∎
Let . Then is divergent, because
Consider the series . The summands somehow cancel with each other so the series should converge, right? However, we see that as . More precisely, for every , you can find such that . Thus the basic non-convergence test shows that diverges.
What about instead? Well, we know that . However, as , so diverges, too.
Write an essay on the relation between sequences and series. Use your own words, examples and illustrations. Be mathematically correct and precise. 200-300 words, excluding mathematical symbols or pictures.